One nervous system for your software estate
Make a dozen systems behave like one platform.
All Enterprise Platform EngineeringThe ERP doesn't talk to the CRM, the e-commerce feed arrives by email, and someone re-keys everything in between. Every manual bridge is latency, error, and a person who can never take leave. Integration is how an estate becomes a platform.
- Re-keying eliminated and reconciliation automated
- Failures that announce themselves instead of hiding for weeks
- New system onboarding in days via standard contracts
What the work actually involves
Integration architecture
Event-driven backbones and API gateways designed for your estate — not middleware for middleware's sake.
ERP/CRM/commerce connectors
Reliable, monitored syncs between the systems that must agree: orders, stock, customers, money.
API platform engineering
Partner and internal APIs with versioning, auth, rate limits, and documentation developers respect.
Banking & government interfaces
Payment gateways, e-invoice, e-way bill, GST, and account-aggregator integrations done to spec.
Observability & replay
Every message tracked; failures alert, queue, and replay instead of silently vanishing.
Event streaming and messaging
Queues and brokers where systems must not wait for each other, with ordering, replay and dead-letter handling designed rather than discovered in production.
API gateway and versioning
Authentication, rate limiting, versioning policy and a developer portal — so an integration partner can self-serve and an old client is not broken by your next release.
What you are handed.
Yours to keep, and written so another team could pick them up.
A canonical model across the systems
One definition of customer, order or patient, mapped to each system's version of it.
Contract-tested interfaces
So a change on one side fails in CI rather than in production at month-end.
Reconciliation and replay
What happens when a message is lost, duplicated or arrives out of order — designed, not discovered.
An integration runbook
Which flows exist, what they depend on, and what to do when one stops.
The engagement
We do not publish prices — scope drives them. Everything else, here.
- Starts with
- A mapping exercise across the systems in scope
- Typical duration
- 8–20 weeks
- Who you get
- An integration architect and two to four engineers
- Commercial model
- Fixed-scope per interface, or phased
What the answer depends on.
Two sets of conditions. Read both against your own situation — most organisations recognise themselves in one column within a sentence or two.
This is the right call when
- Two systems disagree and finance reconciles the difference manually.
- A new product launch waits six months on an integration.
- You are buying software whose value depends on it talking to what you already run.
A different approach fits better when
- A vendor's off-the-shelf connector would do the job.
- One-off data movement — that is a migration, not an integration.
- No access to the systems on either side.
Where we have done this
AI-assisted loan origination for an NBFC
An AI-assisted origination platform that reads documents, flags risk, and routes applications — approval turnaround down 68% with tighter, not looser, controls.
68%Faster approval turnaround
One patient platform, 14 hospitals
Unified appointments, records access, and post-discharge follow-ups across 14 hospitals — no-show rates down 22%, call-centre load down by a third.
22%Reduction in no-shows
Ride-hailing that settles fares in cryptocurrency
A ride-hailing platform where the payment rail is cryptocurrency rather than cards or a wallet.
Questions about systems integration & APIs
Where this comes up most.
The regulatory context and the systems already in the building change the build. Each sector page says how.
More in Enterprise Platform Engineering
If this is close to what you need but not quite it, that gap is usually the useful part of a first call — discuss this capability.