Data & Cloud
Security your auditors respect and attackers resent
Security engineered into the build — and audited like an attacker would.
Security bolted on at the end is theatre. Real posture comes from architecture — identity, boundaries, secrets, and logging designed in — then verified by people thinking like adversaries. Institutions judge partners by this; so do breaches.
- Vulnerabilities found by your tests, not your customers
- Audit evidence produced by systems, not scrambles
- A security story that wins enterprise deals
Capabilities
What the work actually involves
Secure architecture review
Threat modelling and design review before code makes decisions expensive to reverse.
Application security testing
SAST, dependency audits, and manual penetration testing against your actual attack surface.
Identity & access engineering
SSO, least-privilege roles, and secrets management that ends credential sprawl.
Compliance enablement
SOC2-aligned practices, ISO 27001 preparation, and the evidence trails audits demand.
Incident readiness
Logging, detection, and response runbooks rehearsed before you need them.
Secrets, keys and encryption
Key management with defined rotation and custody, encryption in transit and at rest as a default rather than a control added for an audit, and secrets out of source control.
Third-party and supply-chain review
Dependency scanning, licence checks and a software bill of materials — because most of what ships is code nobody in the building wrote.
Deliverables
What you are handed.
Yours to keep, and written so another team could pick them up.
A threat model for your system
What an attacker would go for, ranked, rather than a generic checklist.
VAPT with retest included
Findings fixed and verified. A report with open findings is not a security outcome.
A DPDP position
Consent, purpose limitation, retention, grievance officer — India's Act, not a GDPR document with the names changed.
A posture pack for buyers
The document your enterprise client's procurement team asks for, prepared before they ask.
We do not publish prices — scope drives them. Everything else, here.
- Starts with
- A scoped assessment against the standard or buyer requirement in question
- Typical duration
- 4–12 weeks
- Who you get
- A security architect and a penetration tester
- Commercial model
- Fixed fee per assessment, retest included
How to decide
What the answer depends on.
Two sets of conditions. Read both against your own situation — most organisations recognise themselves in one column within a sentence or two.
This is the right call when
- An enterprise buyer's security review is blocking a deal.
- You handle personal data at scale and the DPDP Act now applies to you.
- You are pursuing ISO 27001 and need the controls to be real.
A different approach fits better when
- You want the certificate without building the underlying controls — that is a different engagement than this one.
- No appetite to fix what a test finds — then do not run the test.
- Looking for a pass on one specific audit rather than controls that hold up generally.
Proof
Where we have done this
Before you ask
Questions about security & compliance
Sectors
Where this comes up most.
The regulatory context and the systems already in the building change the build. Each sector page says how.
Next step
Bring us the problem. We will bring the architecture.
A discovery call takes forty-five minutes. You leave with our read on the problem, the shape of the system we would propose, and a straight answer on whether we are the right team for it.
- No sales deck
- An engineer on the call, not an account manager
- NDA before you share anything