Skip to content
Brihat InfotechBrihat Infotech

Technology Advisory

The technical truth before the term sheet

Know what you're buying, funding, or inheriting — before you sign.

The problem

Acquisitions, investments, and vendor takeovers all hinge on a question someone answers too late: is the technology what they claim? Code, architecture, security, and team risk can be read like a balance sheet — by people who build for a living.

What you get
  • Deal price informed by technical reality
  • Post-acquisition surprises moved pre-signature
  • A remediation roadmap ready for day one

Capabilities

What the work actually involves

01

Codebase & architecture audit

Quality, maintainability, and scaling headroom assessed from the code itself, not the pitch.

02

Security posture review

Vulnerability surface, data handling, and compliance gaps — the liabilities that don't appear in data rooms.

03

Delivery & team assessment

Bus factors, velocity truth, and the difference between documentation and folklore.

04

Cost & scalability modelling

What growth actually costs on this architecture — infrastructure, licenses, and rework.

05

Red-flag & remediation report

Findings ranked by deal impact, with remediation costs estimated for negotiation leverage.

06

Licence and open-source compliance

What the codebase actually depends on and under which licences — copyleft obligations in a product about to be sold is the finding that changes a deal rather than a sprint.

07

Key-person and continuity risk

How much of the system only one person understands, and what the documented recovery path looks like if that person leaves the week after completion.

Deliverables

What you are handed.

Yours to keep, and written so another team could pick them up.

A code and architecture assessment

What is actually there, how much of it is load-bearing, and what it would cost to change.

A team and process review

Key-person risk, delivery capability, and whether the roadmap is achievable by the people present.

A risk register with costs

Each finding priced, so it can be negotiated rather than merely worried about.

A 100-day plan

What to do first if the deal proceeds.

The engagement

We do not publish prices — scope drives them. Everything else, here.

Starts with
Scoped access to the codebase, the team and the roadmap
Typical duration
2–5 weeks
Who you get
A principal architect and a senior engineer
Commercial model
Fixed fee, scoped to target size

How to decide

What the answer depends on.

Two sets of conditions. Read both against your own situation — most organisations recognise themselves in one column within a sentence or two.

This is the right call when

  • You are acquiring or investing and the technology is material to the value.
  • A target's roadmap looks optimistic and you want an independent read.
  • You need findings priced, not just listed.

A different approach fits better when

  • You need it in three days. Real diligence needs code and people access.
  • Only a data room is available, with no access to the codebase or the engineers who wrote it.
  • You want confirmation of a decision already taken.

Before you ask

Questions about technology due diligence

Standard is two to three weeks; compressed one-week passes are possible for smaller targets when deal clocks demand it. Depth flexes to the cheque size at stake.

Next step

Bring us the problem. We will bring the architecture.

A discovery call takes forty-five minutes. You leave with our read on the problem, the shape of the system we would propose, and a straight answer on whether we are the right team for it.

  • No sales deck
  • An engineer on the call, not an account manager
  • NDA before you share anything