Dedicated Teams
The specific skill you are missing, not a generic pair of hands
Named specialists into your existing team, working to your process.
Sometimes the gap is not a team, it is one person: a data engineer for a migration, an SRE for a scaling problem, a mobile lead for two quarters. Hiring for that takes four months and commits you permanently to a temporary need.
- A specific capability in place in weeks rather than a quarter
- No permanent headcount committed to a temporary need
- Access to specialist opinion without a separate engagement
Capabilities
What the work actually involves
Matched to the actual gap
We shortlist against your brief and your codebase, not against a keyword list.
Inside your process
Your standup, your board, your review process. Augmented engineers are not managed at arm's length through a coordinator.
Backed by the bench
An augmented engineer can pull in a Brihat specialist for a day without a new contract — the architecture review or security opinion comes with them.
Replaceable without a gap
If someone is not right, the replacement overlaps with them at our cost until context has transferred.
Monthly, not annual
One-month minimum, thirty days' notice.
Handover as a condition
Documentation and knowledge transfer treated as part of the engagement rather than a favour at the end, so a specialist leaving does not take the reason for their decisions with them.
Working in your compliance boundary
Your devices, your access controls and your data residency where the engagement requires it — the specialist joins your environment rather than importing ours.
Deliverables
What you are handed.
Yours to keep, and written so another team could pick them up.
A shortlist against your actual brief
Matched to your codebase and problem, not to a keyword list.
An engineer inside your process
Your standup, your board, your review process — not managed at arm's length.
Bench access without a new contract
An architecture or security opinion for a day, when it is needed.
Overlapped replacement
If someone is not right, the replacement overlaps at our cost until context has transferred.
We do not publish prices — scope drives them. Everything else, here.
- Starts with
- A brief, then two to four weeks to a start date
- Typical duration
- One-month minimum, thirty days' notice
- Who you get
- One to three named specialists
- Commercial model
- Monthly per engineer
How to decide
What the answer depends on.
Two sets of conditions. Read both against your own situation — most organisations recognise themselves in one column within a sentence or two.
This is the right call when
- The gap is one specific skill, not a team.
- The need is real but temporary and you do not want permanent headcount.
- You have a team that can absorb someone and give them context.
A different approach fits better when
- You want a whole team — a pod comes with shared accountability instead.
- No onboarding capacity. An augmented engineer with no context is an expensive observer.
- You want the cheapest available day rate.
Before you ask
Questions about team augmentation
Sectors
Where this comes up most.
The regulatory context and the systems already in the building change the build. Each sector page says how.
Next step
Bring us the problem. We will bring the architecture.
A discovery call takes forty-five minutes. You leave with our read on the problem, the shape of the system we would propose, and a straight answer on whether we are the right team for it.
- No sales deck
- An engineer on the call, not an account manager
- NDA before you share anything