Skip to content
Brihat InfotechBrihat Infotech

Practice

AI & Intelligent Systems

Strategy, custom LLM platforms, autonomous agents, and the MLOps backbone — AI engineered with the guardrails enterprises need and the outcomes boards expect.

One workflow, production-grade
8–16 wksOne workflow, production-grade
Model interactions logged for audit
100%Model interactions logged for audit
Working software in your environment
Every 2 wksWorking software in your environment
The problem

Every enterprise now has AI ambitions; very few have AI in production doing consequential work. The gap isn't models — it's engineering: data plumbing, evaluation, guardrails, cost control, and integration into the systems where work actually happens. That engineering is our practice.

How we approach it

We treat AI like any other mission-critical system: discovery first, measurable success criteria, phased delivery, and a Prove phase your risk and compliance teams can interrogate. We build the version that still works in month eighteen.

Accountability

What this practice owns.

Not a scope of works — the things that stay our problem for as long as the engagement runs.

The data boundary — what leaves your environment, what never can, and what is redacted in between.

Evaluation: a scored test set that says whether a change made the system better or just different.

Guardrails and the audit trail, built as delivery phases rather than bolted on before go-live.

The unit economics — token spend per transaction, modelled before build and monitored after.

What an engagement looks like

How this practice usually starts.

We do not publish prices — scope drives them, and a number without scope is a guess. Everything else about the shape, here.

Starts with
A paid discovery that ends in a scored feasibility call, not a pitch
Time to production
8–16 weeks to the first workflow live
Who you get
An AI engineer, a platform engineer and an architect, with a data engineer where the pipeline needs one
Commercial model
Fixed-scope discovery, then phased build

What drives the number is on engagement models.

Typical stack
  • Opportunity scoring frameworks
  • Data audits
  • LLM feasibility spikes
  • Governance templates
  • Claude & GPT APIs
  • Open-source LLMs
  • Vector databases
  • Embedding pipelines
  • LangGraph
  • Evaluation frameworks
  • Agent orchestration (LangGraph)
  • Claude & GPT models
  • Workflow engines
  • Enterprise API integration
  • Observability stacks
  • Python ML stack
  • XGBoost & deep learning
  • Feature stores
  • Streaming inference
  • Explainability tooling
  • PyTorch vision models
  • Edge inference (Jetson/ONNX)
  • RTSP pipelines
  • Whisper-class ASR
  • Indian-language models
  • Kubernetes & GPU orchestration
  • vLLM & inference servers
  • Prompt registries
  • Observability (OpenTelemetry)
  • Cost analytics

Before you ask

Questions we hear about AI & intelligent systems

Whichever the problem and your constraints demand. Frontier APIs win on capability-per-effort; self-hosted open-source wins on data boundaries and unit economics at scale. Most enterprise architectures we ship blend both behind an abstraction layer, so you're never locked to one vendor's pricing.

Next step

Bring us the problem. We will bring the architecture.

A discovery call takes forty-five minutes. You leave with our read on the problem, the shape of the system we would propose, and a straight answer on whether we are the right team for it.

  • No sales deck
  • An engineer on the call, not an account manager
  • NDA before you share anything