Skip to content
Brihat InfotechBrihat Infotech

Industry

Government & PSU

Citizen and institutional platforms engineered to public-sector security and audit standards.

Public institutional architecture
The context

Public-sector platforms answer to the hardest reviewers: auditors, regulators, and citizens at scale. IRFC Invest taught us the discipline — security review as a phase, audit trails as architecture, and confidentiality as a habit. We bring that posture to every institutional engagement.

What usually breaks
  • Citizen services queued behind manual verification steps
  • Legacy departmental systems that predate their documentation
  • Audit requirements met by scramble instead of by design
  • Vendor lock-in on platforms the institution can't inspect

What we build here

Systems for government & PSU

01

Citizen & investor platforms

Self-service portals and apps at institutional security posture — IRFC Invest standard.

02

Departmental digitisation

Workflow systems with the approval chains, registers, and audit trails governance requires.

03

Data sovereignty architecture

On-premise and MeitY-empanelled cloud deployments with complete data residency.

04

Build–Operate–Transfer

Platforms delivered with trained teams and full handover — no perpetual dependency.

05

e-Governance service delivery

Citizen services with the service levels a notification commits to — application, tracking, grievance and appeal — built so the department can evidence timelines rather than assert them.

06

India Stack integration

DigiLocker issuance and verification, API Setu data exchange, and Aadhaar-based verification where the department holds the authorisation to use it.

Regulatory context

The rules that shape the build.

Not legal advice — the specific obligations that change what the software has to do, and that are cheapest to design for at the start.

GFR 2017 and GeM procurement

How the contract is awarded shapes what can be delivered and when — and it is unforgiving about documentation.

CVC guidelines

Vigilance requirements around tendering, change and audit trails.

STQC certification

Government applications frequently require STQC audit before go-live; designing for it afterwards is expensive.

MeitY policies and data localisation

Cloud empanelment and where data may reside.

DPDP Act 2023

With the state exemptions that apply, which are narrower than commonly assumed.

What we integrate with

Nothing new arrives into an empty building. These are the systems that usually have to keep working, and talking to them is normally the larger half of the engagement.

  • NIC-hosted applications
  • Legacy departmental databases
  • e-Office and file movement
  • Aadhaar and DigiLocker interfaces
  • Paper-first processes
What this sector measures
Citizen TAT
Service turnaround
Audit ready
Documentation completeness
Uptime
Against the SLA in the contract

Before you ask

Questions about government & PSU

Yes — we support tender-based engagement, documentation requirements, and the compliance posture PSU procurement expects. Write to us with the tender reference for a capability response.

Next step

Bring us the problem. We will bring the architecture.

A discovery call takes forty-five minutes. You leave with our read on the problem, the shape of the system we would propose, and a straight answer on whether we are the right team for it.

  • No sales deck
  • An engineer on the call, not an account manager
  • NDA before you share anything